Close Loopholes In Gambling Law
Tic Tac Fruit" could turn out to be a lemon for Ohioans unless - and possibly even if - state legislators don't do something about it and similar "games." "Tic Tac Fruit" is familiar to many in East Ohio. It is a video "gaming" machine that looks and operates much like a video gambling machine. It gained popularity last year because its promoters, claiming it was not subject to the state's laws against gambling, opened up parlors with "Tic Tac Fruit" and similar machines in many areas of the state, including ours. Promoters of the machines claim they are not gambling devices because players affect the outcome - whether they win or lose. But late last year, a judge in Franklin County Common Pleas Court ruled that "Tic Tac Fruit" is a gambling device. He noted that the machines are programmed to guarantee that operators will make profits of 5 percent of the amount of money pumped into each device. That means that player skill is not the critical factor, the judge ruled. His ruling backs up the state Liquor Control Commission, which has banned "Tic Tac Fruit" and similar games in licensed bars. But the judge warned that new "gaming" machines - all designed to rake in money in large quantities from players - will be designed. That may make it less easy for the courts to rule that such devices are illegal gambling machines, he said. In November, Ohio voters said no to legalized machine gambling at racetracks and a few other locations. We don't believe they want to permit electronic one-armed (or one-buttoned) bandits masquerading as "games." That makes it essential for legislators to take another look at Ohio's gambling laws and close loopholes that allow devices such as "Tic Tac Fruit."

<< Home